The Macedonian Tendency: United Macedonian Diaspora
Showing posts with label United Macedonian Diaspora. Show all posts
Showing posts with label United Macedonian Diaspora. Show all posts

Friday, September 02, 2011

Macedonia: name dispute or ethnic misdeeds? - On Line Opinion - 12/8/2011

Macedonia: name dispute or ethnic misdeeds? - On Line Opinion - 12/8/2011:

Metodija A. Koloski is president of United Macedonian Diaspora, an international nongovernmental and nonpartisan organization addressing the interests and needs of Macedonians and Macedonian communities throughout the world.


In August 1903, Macedonian patriots rose against the Ottoman Empire. While they won Macedonian independence for only a limited time, it was clear that Macedonian national consciousness was alive.
Today, there is a nonsensical “dispute” about the same land, as Greece denies the right of the Republic of Macedoniato call itself by that name. In doing so, Greece disregards the United Nations Charter’s admonition that all people have the right to self-determination. Greece’s stated basis for this “dispute” is that the Republic of Macedonia supposedly harbors “territorial ambitions” toward northern Greece. The Greek government also claims Macedonia misappropriates “Greek history.”
The Republic of Macedonia amended its constitution to unequivocally disclaim any “territorial ambitions,” and it changed national symbols to remove “Greek” connections. But Greek government intransigence persists.
Advertisement
The real reason for the “dispute” is that, since Greece forcibly took possession of a large part of historical Macedonia following the Balkan Wars of 1912-13, it has denied the existence of the Macedonian people and ruthlessly pursued a policy of forced assimilation. These actions constitute genocide under the 1948 Genocide Convention (to which Greece is bound).
Specifically, Greek governments have harassed, jailed and even tortured those who spoke Macedonian or otherwise practiced their cultural heritage. Greek governments also forcibly changed city names, family names, and even names on gravestones from their true Macedonian names to “Greek” ones. And, as documented in recent U.S. State Department Human Rights Reports, Greece has even denied entry into Greece to U.S. citizens, born in Greece, but whose names are not “Greek” (e.g., Gatzoulis is “Greek”, but Gatzova isn’t).
Greece took these actions “with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group”… by “[c]ausing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group” or “deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part.” (Genocide Convention, Article II)
An independent Macedonian state is anathema to Greece because it is an embarrassing reminder of Greece’s failed attempts to wipe out the Macedonian people. This policy led to massive migrations of Macedonian-identifying people to America, Australia and Canada and, sadly, also to some Macedonians identifying themselves (at least publicly) as Greek.
The international community has rejected Greece’s heavy handed position: more than 120 countries — including America, Canada, China and Russia — recognise the Republic of Macedonia by its constitutional name. In fact, Greece’s own top diplomat to the Republic of Macedonia, Dora Grosomanidou, stated on July 8 to the Financial Timesthat “Greece has to face the new reality, as the… Republic of Macedonia has been recognized under its constitutional name [Macedonia] by more than half of the members of the U.N.” The Greek government sacked her the very next day.
The Greek lobby continues to misrepresent the “name dispute.” Recently, it began a campaign to undermine the U. S. government’s decision to recognise the Republic of Macedonia’s constitutional name. The lobby has forced the issue onto the U.S. Congress by seeking passage of legislative resolutions reciting various Greek misrepresentations. Their bogus arguments include that Macedonians are really just Bulgarians or Serbs and that Macedonia is a haven for terrorists.
Advertisement
The claim that Macedonians are Bulgarians or Serbs is false and tellingly callous. Ethnographers and historians have concluded that Macedonians are a separate people. Greek claims also are undercut by historical Greek census data revealing the Macedonian language was spoken in northern Greece in the 1920s, counted separately from Bulgarian, Greek and Serbian. Furthermore, the Greek government in the late 1920s published, but later banned and burned, several thousand-grammar books for Macedonian schoolchildren, written in Macedonian.
A new false Greek claim, which emerged after brief civil unrest in Macedonia in 2001, is the outrageous allegation that Macedonia is a haven for terrorists. The opposite is true: Macedonia has been a staunch U.S. ally, particularly in the War on Terror. For example, Macedonia has deployed, beginning shortly after September 11, 2001, about 200 troops to Afghanistan and Iraq. Moreover, through its diligent efforts at building a democratic, free market and pro-Western state, Macedonia is poised for entry into NATO.
While sentiment toward the United States in Macedonia is overwhelmingly positive, the opposite is true in Greece, as it regularly ranks near the bottom in surveys of attitudes toward the U.S. In January 2007, the U.S. Embassy was hit by a rocket attack from a Greek terrorist group, “Revolutionary Struggle,” itself a spin-off of the notorious Marxist terrorist group, “17 November,” which murdered several U.S. diplomats and military personnel, including a CIA station chief. Yet, ironically, we are asked to believe Macedonia is a haven for terrorists and that Greeks are pro-American.
The Republic of Macedonia has done more than enough to demonstrate it does not harbor claims on Greek territory. It is high time for Greece to act responsibly and cease its ugly gamesmanship aimed at covering up its misdeeds. It is only logical that those whose roots are in Macedonia should be able to identify as Macedonians.

Wednesday, June 25, 2008

Help Children in Macedonia

"UMD" and "Splash of Hope "announce partnership
"Fund for Macedonian Children":
United Macedonian Diaspora -

DATE: 06-25-2008
Contact Information: United Macedonian Diaspora,
Charitable Efforts Coordinator
Aleksandra Trpkovska, (586) 383-1721,
charity@umdiaspora.org

WASHINGTON, D.C. & LOS ANGELES - June 25, 2008 - The United Macedonian Diaspora (UMD) and Splash of Hope are pleased to announce a partnership to form The Fund for Macedonian Children. The Fund’s goal is to invest in the creation of effective humanitarian programs designed to benefit the youth of Macedonia and thereby forge a better future for the entire Balkan region.

The first signature project of the Fund will be a project entitled Building a Future, Today (BFT). The Macedonian Mission for Humanity (MMH) will join UMD and Splash of Hope in the execution of the Building a Future, Today project.

The project aims to foster a positive development for children and youth in Macedonia based upon the principles that all 180,000 primary school students in Macedonia deserve:
• A safe environment that encourages personal growth;
• Hygienic supplies necessary for healthy development;
• Freedom and resources to utilize and apply individual talents, ingenuity, and resourcefulness;
• A strong sense of personal dignity and self worth based on strong Macedonian traditions and cultural values;
• Access to world-class education in order to prepare for the growing demands of a global economy.

Upcoming plans of the project are to:
• Provide educational supplies on an ongoing basis to schools and foster homes in need;
• Provide clothing, shoes, and other necessities to orphans throughout the country;
• Foster a partnership with USAID ’s Primary Education Project in Macedonia to improve the quality of primary education by developing extracurricular academic activities for children; and;
• Establish a scholarship program for Macedonian youth to help them pursue higher education.

For more information or to become a partner, please contact UMD Charitable Efforts Coordinator Aleksandra Trpkovska at (586) 383-1721 or charity@umdiaspora.orgThis e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it .

To donate or become a sponsor of The Fund for Macedonian Children, please click HERE.

The Republic of Macedonia is a nation of 2.1 million people situated in the Balkan peninsula of southeast Europe. Currently, Macedonia is the first wireless country in the world and is implementing a project called “PC for Each Child.”

United Macedonian Diaspora (UMD) is an international non-governmental organization addressing the interests and needs of Macedonians and Macedonian communities throughout the world since 2004.

Splash of Hope is a non-profit organization founded by Macedonian-Ukrainian-American actor Kristopher Maslardzievski dedicated to improving the lives of foster children in California, and is seeking to expand its vital work internationally.

Macedonian Mission for Humanity (MMH) is a U.S. based non-governmental, non-profit organization that seeks to provide humanitarian assistance and support to Macedonian individuals and businesses around the world.

Friday, June 20, 2008

United Macedonian Diaspora - UMD Thanks Congressman K. Michael Conaway

UMD Thanks Congressman K. Michael Conaway
United Macedonian Diaspora -
Friday, 20 June 2008






June 18, 2008

The Honorable K. Michael Conaway
511 Cannon House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515

RE: Withdrawal of Sponsorship of House Resolution 356

Dear Congressman Conaway:

On behalf of all Macedonian-Americans, the United Macedonian Diaspora (UMD) thanks you for withdrawing your co-sponsorship of House Resolution 356.

Your wise decision to withdraw your sponsorship of House Resolution 356 honors the Republic of Macedonia, the outstanding relationship amongst the United States and Macedonia, and is welcomed by all Macedonian-Americans as House Resolution 356 inaccurately portrays Macedonia’s constructive approach to resolving the unfortunate “name dispute” over Macedonia’s name. Your decision is also in keeping with our nation’s rightful policy of recognizing and employing Macedonia’s constitutional name, the Republic of Macedonia, and our nation’s desire that Macedonia be admitted to NATO.

As you know, Macedonia is a strong and committed ally of the United States with combat troops serving alongside American troops in both Iraq and Afghanistan. Macedonia, like the United States, is committed to the principles of individual liberty, civil rights, freedom, and the rule of law. Macedonia’s transformation from a constituent republic of a failed communist state to a stable. multi-ethnic, democratic and independent nation is a remarkable success story; Macedonia’s continued success and its full Euro-Atlantic integration, including its NATO and EU membership, should not be impeded by Greece’s baseless objection to Macedonia’s name.

Once more, on behalf of all Macedonian-Americans, thank you for withdrawing your sponsorship of House Resolution 356 and for your service to the American people and our great nation.

Sincerely

Metodija A. Koloski
President


Friday, June 06, 2008

June 6th - "Slav-Macedonian" Rears Its Ugly Head!

By David Edenden: More proof that the EU is not a friend of Macedonia!
For three days, we were “Slav-Macedonians” in Brussels!
United Macedonian Diaspora -

Friday, 23 May 2008
Utrinski Vesnik

Greece is introducing the issue of the Macedonian language into EU through the front door “Slav-Macedonians” Appears in Meijer's Report!

Long-ranging strategy of Athens to fight everything with the adjective “Macedonian”


By Slobodanka Jovanovska

Translated by UMD Staff

Brussels – While Macedonia is dealing with elections, Greece does everything possible to undermine our position in the EU. So, these days, they even managed to change Eric Meijer's report on our country, which, already agreed in detail and signed, was posted on the European Parliament's (EP) website with changed denomination for our country's language!

The term “Slav-Macedonian language” was removed and replaced by the agreed term “Macedonian language” only after the Foreign Ministry's and our embassy's intervention after this scandalous Greek provocation was featured on the EP website for three days.

The EP has no clear explanation on how it was possible to have an agreed document be published with changed content, which in itself is already a scandal in this institution. Furthermore, considering the fact that due to the instructions and pressures (performed behind the scenes) by the creator of the report Eric Meijer, this document had to be created following strict regulations including the terminology of the language, which, by the way, is outside of EU's jurisdiction.

As far as I know, this is the Greek diplomacy's second attempt to intervene on the name of the Macedonian language after exerting pressure on the EESC (The European Economic and Social Committee) to eradicate each and every adjective “Macedonian” and to call the language “Slav-Macedonian,” against which the Foreign Ministry and our embassy protested. The committee has been searching for weeks to find a term that would satisfy Greece, while not violating the European regulations, which are on our side by clearly stating that the language of Macedonia is “Macedonian language,” the adjective to be used is “Macedonian,” and the country code is “MK,” although the last one is marked as temporary, the final one pending an agreement within the UN.

Obviously, EU's attempts to stay out of the Greek-Macedonian dispute are failing, especially after the scandal of banning MAT flights and the issue of the term “Macedonian.” Brussels is well on its way to finally realize that the problem is not just the country’s name, but many things that are related to Macedonia. Even if it manages not to get involved in the dispute on the name of the country , it will not be able to avoid the language name dispute.

Besides the standardized terminology for the languages within the UN, which has to be used in the EU as well, Greece takes advantage of the loose regulations within the EU. There is a guarantee for accepting the languages of the member states, but no article for accepting the names of their languages, because in practice nobody has ever complained about it.

Namely, the EU commits to respecting the “cultural, religious, and linguistic diversity of the candidate countries” and to accept the languages chosen by their governments and citizens, not stating anything about the possibility of one country not challenging the language, but the name of the language of another country, although Macedonia is facing all possible aspects.

Athens, obviously, is getting ready to introduce the issue on the Macedonian language through the front door, although it publicly declares it wants a fair and quick solution to the dispute. Another indicator of the fact that these are not just current moves but a long-term strategy is the way Athens deals with the new European Common Aviation Area (ECAA) Agreement, signed by the EU and the Western Balkans states. Greece would not ratify it, so they will be able to avoid the decision of the court in Luxembourg and therefore Brussels will have to ask them to comply with the agreement rather than being able to force them to do so.

To make a long story short, Macedonia is well on the way to be the first country to have a dispute on the name of its language in the EU, although the EU is fostering over 60 languages, some of which are hardly spoken.

Yet, there is the precondition for the languages to be able to “cover” the terminology of the European regulations, so that the people would be able to have a clear insight into the decisions in Brussels. The languages that don’t pass this “test” and those not spoken by anyone are excluded by a special decree from the obligation of translating. However, the experience with the incorporation of the ten Eastern European countries has shown that the EU by no means wants to get involved into such cross-national disputes. So, before the incorporation each country had to sign bilateral agreements to guarantee a solution for their respective language and minority issues.

The question of how to deal with minority issues and the use of their languages was a top issue at the enlargement of the EU. As a result of this, agreements could be reached by Hungary, Romania, Slovenia, Slovakia, Poland, the Czech Republic and Germany with their respective neighbours. However, the Macedonian case is unique due to the fact that the language of the country itself is a main issue together with that of the minorities. A further problem is that Bulgaria, when it became a EU member state, avoided to resolve the issue with the Macedonian minority in a proper way and therefore the question with the Macedonian language remained open. This fact could cause a “solution” to our disadvantage in the future.

In fact, the languages are an area where the EU still is “skating on thin ice”. Hitherto it dealt with it only once when elaborating a study on the use of minority languages in the member states. In this study there is also a section for the Macedonian language in Greece, clearly emphasizing the tendency among the population to name the language as such, despite the so-called “scientific” attempts by Athens to denominate it as uncivilized, as different from that in Macedonia, as a sort of dialect of the ancient Greek language and similar propositions.

In the study, which was introduced some ten years ago, after the Interim Agreement had been signed, a clear picture is drawn by creating a map showing citizens of Macedonian descent in Greece, over 360 families all in all, 70 of which live around Lerin. Furthermore, such details are mentioned as the fact that 285 families descending from Lerin live in Toronto at present, over 700 live in Macedonia, as well as the fact that every Cyrillic inscription on frescos in that part of Greece had been eradicated systematically, so they can no longer be found. The study clearly illustrates the development of the awareness of a distinct Macedonian language during the last two centuries, and pointing out the factors responsible for its naming as “Slavic”/”Slav-Macedonian”, even Bulgarian in some period of history.

“Our collocutors named the language Macedonian” is a statement in the study which was done by leading scientists. Even the fact that some citizens simply called their language “ours” to differentiate it from the others was mentioned as a curiosity.

The study has been ordered by the EU, but it is not its official platform. The EU has neither the control, nor the expertise to deal with issues as is this ongoing issue between Greece and Macedonia. The return of such a denomination appearing in Eric Meijer's report is the first real defeat for Brussels, which allows it to be taken in by the Greek daily politics on an issue that leaves no room for EU decisions.

Monday, December 10, 2007

Macedonianss Telling The Truth to Power!

Name dispute covers up real Macedonian problem |
The Journal Gazette: Fort Wayne Indiana
Argie N. Bellio is a Fort Wayne-born Macedonian-American and member of the United Macedonian Diaspora, a global non-governmental association addressing the interests and needs of Macedonians and Macedonian communities throughout the world. Metodija A. Koloski, is a Macedonian-American living in Washington, D.C., and is president and co-founder of the United Macedonian Diaspora. They wrote this for Fort Wayne newspapers.
A diplomatic point of no return is inching ever closer in the Balkans, threatening to make it once again live up to its reputation as the powder keg of Europe. No, this is not the Kosovo dilemma, but the 16-year-old dispute initiated by Greece over the Republic of Macedonia’s constitutional name.

The dispute erupted after the Republic of Macedonia declared its independence from Yugoslavia in 1991 and, according to Athens, is based on its fears that Macedonia will press irredentist claims on a province in northern Greece, which it renamed Macedonia in 1988. How the Republic of Macedonia could ever pursue such claims has never been explained.

After years of Greek stonewalling and a three-year illegal embargo, the Interim Accord between the two nations allowed Macedonia’s admission into the United Nations. However, this was achieved only when Macedonia was forced to accept the interim name “The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia,” or “FYROM,” and with its seat in the general assembly between Thailand and Timor Leste.

Understandably, the term “FYROM” is demeaning to Macedonians, and it makes about as much sense as “Former Ottoman Province of Greece” or “Former German Province of Poland.”

Despite Greek objections, more than 120 countries, including the U.S. and all of the other the former Yugoslav nations, recognize the Republic of Macedonia’s under its true name.

The recognition by the U.S. is important to Macedonia and shows the close bond between the two nations. Macedonia is participating in military operations in Iraq, Afghanistan, Bosnia and Lebanon. It is also a candidate for NATO membership and expects an invitation to join NATO in the near future.

Greece, sadly, is threatening to veto the Republic of Macedonia’s NATO entry unless the term “Macedonia” is removed from its name. Such threats are in direct contravention to the Interim Accord, which bars Greece from impeding the Republic of Macedonia’s accession to international bodies including NATO and the European Union, as long as Macedonia is admitted under the U.N. provisional reference term.

Vetoing the Republic of Macedonia’s NATO membership will create great instability in the region, with potential spillover effects in Kosovo, Albania, Serbia and even Greece itself. Hence, the name dispute remains a potential fuse for yet another Balkan war.

So why does Greece continue this quixotic war against Macedonia’s name? It is about a skillful cover-up of continued Greek oppression of its ethnic minorities, including ethnic Macedonians who continue to live within Greek borders and number in the hundreds of thousands. According to the Greek government, Greece is an ethnically pure state, though a proper census has never been permitted in modern times to prove that.

Thus, the obvious fear in the Greek psyche has nothing to do with the Republic of Macedonia at all. It has everything to do with the large ethnic Macedonian minority in Greece. This ongoing denial of basic civil rights to ethnic Macedonians in Greece is well documented by the U.S. Department of State, the European Court of Human Rights, Human Rights Watch and other international human rights groups.

The Republic of Macedonia’s existence and choice of name are sovereign rights, and it is the Republic of Macedonia’s prerogative to promote, preserve and protect the Macedonian ethnic identity and culture on behalf of millions of Macedonians around the world. Such are the rights and prerogative of any sovereign state.

Greece should end this farce of a “name dispute” for the sake of regional stability. The U.S. should pressure its NATO ally Greece to do just that, and the U.S. Congress should continue promoting stability in the Balkans by not passing SR 300 or HR 356.

Tuesday, November 27, 2007

Greece and The Macedonian Question Today

About Me

David Edenden - My Pseudonym

My "Salade Macedoine" Politics

Websites


Rainbow - (Vinozito) European Free Alliance
(Political party of the Ethnic Macedonians in Greece)

United Macedonian Diaspora




The Spectator, 1992


New York Times (1994)


Human Rights Watch 1994




"What's in a Name" Negotiations

Theodora, We hardly Knew Ye!



Books


Loring Danforth





Robert Kaplan












Kosovo

Richard Holbrooke, Why Do You Think You Are God?


Basic Greek Position on Ethnic Macedonians

1. Greece has no ethnic minorities

2. Greece has "Slavophone" Greeks who are loyal Greeks.

4. "Slavophones" speak an idiom but have no "real" language, culture of history.

5. "Slavophones" supported the Communists "en masse" during the Greek Civil War.

6. Communist promised recognition of Macedonians as a "people".

6. Greek Communist were granted amnesty and allowed to return to Greece.

7. Ethnic Macedonians Communists were not allowed to return.

8. Ethnic Macedonians who emigrated from Greece are blacklisted from returning, if they engage in Macedonian cultural activities ... such as marrying in the Macedonian Orthodox Church.

My Comments

The mistreatment of ethnic Macedonians in Greece is the inspiration for every racist, every fascist and every ethnic cleanser in the Balkans ... I'm talking to you Samantha Power!

The United States, the EU and Nato are complicit in the ongoing cultural genocide, of the Macedonian people who have lived in Greece, considered the cradle of democracy, for 1,500 years ... I'm talking to you Greek Issues Caucus! and Tom Lantos

Since Greece is a member of Nato and the EU, Greek values regarding minority rights for ethnic Macedonians in Greece are also Nato and EU values. Serbs in Kosovo who look to Nato and the EU to guarantee their rights are insane! I'm talking to you Javier Solana and Richard Holbrooke!

Wednesday, November 07, 2007

Congressional Quarterly on Macedonians

By David Edenden

This is an old article from the summer about the Macedonians in Bulgaria by the Washington based Congressional Quarterly. Good work by the United Macedonia Diaspora.
Congressional Quaterly

In Bulgaria, 750,000 ethnic Turks have their own political party, which scored 20 percent in the country’s European Parliament elections in May, much to the annoyance of far right nationalist groups like the Ataka party, which won 14 percent. Other minorities around the region include the Gagauz, a Turkic people in Romania and Bulgaria; the Vlachs, who speak a Romanian-type language and live in Bulgaria and Romania; and the Pomaks, ethnic Bulgarians who became Muslims during Ottoman rule.

The Macedonians in Bulgaria show just how contentious ethnic issues can be. The Bulgarian government says there are only 5,000 Macedonians living in Bulgaria, but in reality there are between 100,000 and 200,000, according to Metodija Koloski, a member of the Washington-based United Macedonian Diaspora advocacy group. The government also refuses to recognize the Macedonian language and prevents Macedonians from forming a political party or their own Orthodox Church, he contends.

Unlike ethnic Hungarians, however, the Macedonians have no one defending them. The government of neighboring Macedonia does not want to alienate Bulgaria and Greece, according to Koloski, because it needs their support to join the EU and NATO.

In November 2006, when the European Parliament was voting on whether to accept Bulgaria into the EU, the EFA proposed demanding that Bulgaria allow ethnic Macedonians to register a political party. Bulgaria had banned the Macedonians’ Umo Ilinden Pirin party because it did not have enough members.

“The amendment was rejected 303-141, but considering the fierce lobby from the Bulgarian government, 141 votes was quite a lot,” says the EFA’s Dauwen, noting that in 2006 the European Court of Human Rights ruled that Bulgaria had violated the Macedonians’ right of freedom of association and that Sofia has been dragging its heels in implementing the judgment.

But Bulgarian Ambassador to the United States Elena Poptodorova, who was born in Bulgaria’s Macedonian region, insists “these people are not Macedonians. To recognize their language would be like saying Austrian is a different language from German.” She feels the campaign is an effort by Macedonians to distance themselves from Bulgaria in order to establish their own identity.

Monday, October 22, 2007

Keeping UN Envoy Matthew Nimetz's Feet to the Fire.

Note: Transferred from old site: The Macedonian Tendency (http://david-edenden.blogspot.com/)

By David Edenden

It looks like a good team of people went to meet with Nimetz. I do not expect too much to come of this meeting. I am not sure why the "Name Issue" is on the UN agenda while human rights for Macedonians in Greece is not on the agenda. Is there anyway to put pressure on Nimetz to at least address this issue?

Macedonian Diaspora Leaders Meet With UN Envoy Matthew Nimetz by Metodija A. Koloski

By Metodija A. Koloski

May 20, 2004


Representative leaders from the Macedonian Diaspora in North America Gligor Tashkovich of New York City, Metodija A. Koloski of the United Macedonian Diaspora in Washington, D.C. and Mark Opashinov of the Macedonian Human Rights Movement of Canada in Toronto met earlier this month with United Nations envoy Ambassador Matthew Nimetz who is responsible for the mediation between the Republic of Greece and the Republic of Macedonia. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss the recent proposal of 'Republika Makedonija-Skopje' made by Ambassador Nimetz to be used for bilateral relations between Greece and Macedonia.

The Macedonian Diaspora representatives pointed out to Ambassador Nimetz that in accordance with relevant international norms, the Republic of Macedonia -- as is the case with any other country -- has the right to self-determination, which is enshrined in the United Nations Charter. One of the basic definitions of this right is the right to one's identity and name. The Republic of Macedonia does not hold nor does it claim to hold exclusive rights over the name Macedonia in geographic, cultural, or historic terms. However, Greece does not have any such exclusive rights either. The representatives further explained that the Republic of Macedonia is neither demanding change nor objecting to the use of the name 'Macedonia' to designate Greece's northern province.

Regarding the name proposal made by Ambassador Nimetz, the representatives pointed out that the proposed name is derogatory and adversely affects Macedonians in Greece. The proposed name would open the doors for Greece to refer to ethnic Macedonians - including those that live in Greece - as 'Skopjians,' a term that Macedonians everywhere consider derogatory. The implicit sanction of this term by such a bilateral resolution to the name dispute will have especially harsh consequences for the Macedonians of Greece, as it would legitimize Greece's official policy of non-recognition and persecution of its sizable ethnic Macedonian national minority.

The Macedonian Diaspora representatives reiterated that the discussions between Greece and Macedonia are about bilateral recognition only, and should neither impact nor impede continued international recognition of the Republic of Macedonia under its constitutional name.

The United Macedonian Diaspora is an international organization whose mission is to address the interests and needs of Macedonians and Macedonian communities throughout the world.

Contact: (202) 294-3400; umdiaspora@gmail.com

The Macedonian Human Rights Movement of Canada (MHRMC) has been active on human rights issues for Macedonians and other oppressed peoples since 1986. Its main objective is to pursue and attain all fundamental human and national rights including the right of freedom of expression and association and to support all democratic principles for all ethnic Macedonians, and other oppressed peoples.

Contact: (416) 850-7125; office@mhrmc.ca"

Wednesday, October 10, 2007

Macedonians Fight Back on the Pages of the Washington Times

By David Edenden

It is a real coup Metodija A. Koloski, of the United Macedonian Diaspora to get published in the Washington Times. The original discussion appears below.

Name dispute or ethnic misdeeds?
Washington Times
October 14, 2007

Metodija A. Koloski -

In August 1903, Macedonian patriots rose against the Ottoman Empire. While they won Macedonian independence for only a limited time, it was clear that Macedonian national consciousness was alive.

Today, there is a nonsensical "dispute" about the same land, as Greece denies the right of the Republic of Macedonia to call itself by that name. In doing so, Greece disregards the United Nations Charter's admonition that all people have the right to self-determination. Greece's stated basis for this "dispute" is that the Republic of Macedonia supposedly harbors "territorial ambitions" toward northern Greece. The Greek government also claims Macedonia misappropriates "Greek history."

The Republic of Macedonia amended its constitution to unequivocally disclaim any "territorial ambitions," and it changed national symbols to remove "Greek" connections. But Greek government intransigence persists.

The real reason for the "dispute" is that, since Greece forcibly took possession of a large part of historical Macedonia following the Balkan Wars of 1912-13, it has denied the existence of the Macedonian people and ruthlessly pursued a policy of forced assimilation. These actions constitute genocide under the 1948 Genocide Convention (to which Greece is bound).

Specifically, Greek governments have harassed, jailed and even tortured those who spoke Macedonian or otherwise practiced their cultural heritage. Greek governments also forcibly changed city names, family names, and even names on gravestones from their true Macedonian names to "Greek" ones. And, as documented in recent U.S. State Department Human Rights Reports, Greece has even denied entry into Greece to U.S. citizens, born in Greece, but whose names are not "Greek" (e.g., Gatzoulis is "Greek", but Gatzova isn't). Greece took these actions "with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group"... by "[c]ausing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group" or "•eliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part." (Genocide Convention, Article II.)

An independent Macedonian state is anathema to Greece because it is an embarrassing reminder of Greece's failed attempts to wipe out the Macedonian people. This policy led to massive migrations of Macedonian-identifying people to the United States, Australia and Canada and, sadly, also to some Macedonians identifying themselves (at least publicly) as Greek.

The international community has rejected Greece's heavyhanded position: more than 120 countries — including the United States, Canada, China and Russia — recognize the Republic of Macedonia by its constitutional name. In fact, Greece's own top diplomat to the Republic of Macedonia, Dora Grosomanidou, stated on July 8 to the Financial Times that "Greece has to face the new reality, as the... Republic of Macedonia has been recognized under its constitutional name [Macedonia] by more than half of the members of the U.N." The Greek government sacked her the very next day.

The Greek lobby continues to misrepresent the "name dispute." Recently, it began a campaign to undermine the U. S. government's decision to recognize the Republic of Macedonia's constitutional name. The lobby has forced the issue onto the U.S. Congress by seeking passage of legislative resolutions reciting various Greek misrepresentations. Their bogus arguments include that Macedonians are really just Bulgarians or Serbs and that Macedonia is a haven for terrorists.

The claim that Macedonians are Bulgarians or Serbs is false and tellingly callous. Ethnographers and historians have concluded that Macedonians are a separate people. Greek claims also are undercut by historical Greek census data revealing the Macedonian language was spoken in northern Greece in the 1920s, counted separately from Bulgarian, Greek and Serbian. Furthermore, the Greek government in the late 1920s published, but later banned and burned, several thousand grammar books for Macedonian schoolchildren, written in Macedonian.

A new false Greek claim, which emerged after brief civil unrest in Macedonia in 2001, is the outrageous allegation that Macedonia is a haven for terrorists. The opposite is true: Macedonia has been a staunch U.S. ally, particularly in the War on Terror. For example, Macedonia has deployed, beginning shortly after September 11, 2001, about 200 troops to Afghanistan and Iraq. Moreover, through its diligent efforts at building a democratic, free market and pro-Western state, Macedonia is poised for entry into NATO.

While sentiment toward the United States in Macedonia is overwhelmingly positive, the opposite is true in Greece, as it regularly ranks near the bottom in surveys of attitudes toward the U.S. In January 2007, the U.S. Embassy was hit by a rocket attack from a Greek terrorist group, "Revolutionary Struggle," itself a spin-off of the notorious Marxist terrorist group, "17 November," which murdered several U.S. diplomats and military personnel, including a CIA station chief. Yet, ironically, we are asked to believe Macedonia is a haven for terrorists and that Greeks are pro-American.

The Republic of Macedonia has done more than enough to demonstrate it does not harbor claims on Greek territory. It is high time for Greece to act responsibly and cease its ugly gamesmanship aimed at covering up its misdeeds. It is only logical that those whose roots are in Macedonia should be able to identify as Macedonians.

Metodija A. Koloski is president of United Macedonian Diaspora, an international nongovernmental and nonpartisan organization addressing the interests and needs of Macedonians and Macedonian communities throughout the world.




Embassy Row

Washington Times
October 10, 2007


James Morrison - Affront to Greece

Greece is outraged anew by the "arrogance" of its northern neighbor, which infuriated Greek diplomats with its antics at the opening of the U.N. General Assembly.

"What happened was unique in U.N. history. They openly defied U.N. principles," Deputy Foreign Minister Yannis G. Valinakis told Embassy Row.

The action that enraged Greek diplomats once again involved Greece's dispute over the name of its neighbor, which is officially known at the United Nations as the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia or FYROM. Macedonian officials, however, have all but dropped the clumsy acronym and are insisting that their country be known as the Republic of Macedonia.

Greece strongly objects to its neighbor's use of that name, which is historically associated with the northern region of Greece and with Alexander the Great. Macedonia even named its international airport after the ancient Greek hero.

Macedonia made its latest effort to drop the FYROM label on Sept. 25, when its U.N. ambassador, Srgjan Kerim, presided over the opening session of the General Assembly. The duties of the president of the assembly include recognizing heads of states, who deliver annual speeches.

When he introduced the leader of his own country, Mr. Kerim recognized President Branko Crvenkovski of the Republic of Macedonia and created a diplomatic incident.

Mr. Valinakis accused Mr. Kerim of violating the duties of his office and using the U.N. forum to advance a contentious political issue, namely, the name.

"This is why we were so shocked. This demonstrates that this country has been dealing with arrogance," Mr. Valinakis said in Washington at a dinner at the residence of Greek Ambassador Alexandros Mallias. "They are not sitting down to compromise. This is becoming even more infuriating for us."

Mr. Valinakis complained that Macedonia got a political boost from the United States when the Bush administration dropped the FYROM name in 2005, after Macedonia agreed to send a few troops to Iraq. He called the action "Rumsfeld gift," referring to former Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld.

"We only learned about this two hours before it was made public," Mr. Valinakis said.

"Macedonia has always been our name and our history," he added. "Names are vehicles of policies. Their use of Macedonia is an affront to Greek territorial integrity."

In July, Macedonian Foreign Minister Antonio Milososki defended the use of the name in an interview with Embassy Row.

"Our name is the cornerstone of our identity," he said. "It is the basic right of all nations to use the name it has chosen."