The Macedonian Tendency

Saturday, December 22, 2007

Macedonia urges Greece not to block its NATO bid over name dispute, wants high-level talks - Print Version - International Herald Tribune

Macedonia urges Greece not to block its NATO bid over name dispute, wants high-level talks - Print Version - International Herald Tribune:

Tuesday, December 18, 2007

SKOPJE, Macedonia: Macedonia urged Greece Tuesday not to block its NATO accession bid over a long-running dispute over its name, and called for high-level talks to resolve the problem.

Foreign Minister Antonio Milososki said NATO-member Greece's right to use its veto if there is no agreement on the name issue "is the same as having the right to a nuclear weapon."

"I believe Greece is a serious state, which will think twice before deciding to use such an option," Milososki said.

It was the strongest statement so far from Macedonia, which has staked much on its bid to join NATO, accelerating anti-corruption and human rights reforms requested by the alliance.

The name dispute has soured relations between the two Balkan neighbors — and strong trading partners — since Macedonia gained independence from Yugoslavia in 1991. Greece says Macedonia's name could imply territorial claims on its own northern region of Macedonia, and insists on calling the country the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia.

(David Edenden - Macedonia says that Greece denies human rights and the very existence of their ethnic Macedonian minority which is OK with the EU and NATO and does not seem to bother the Associated Press because they never mention it in articles like this!)

A senior foreign ministry official said Tuesday that Milososki had written to his Greek counterpart, Dora Bakoyannis, proposing to meet for direct negotiations.

Greek and Macedonian diplomats will hold United Nations-supervised talks next month in Skopje, with a second round of talks scheduled shortly afterward in Athens. But the new proposal would seek to fast-track the process.

"The idea is for the foreign ministers of both countries to meet twice a year," the Macedonian official told the Associated Press on condition of anonymity, due to the sensitivity of the issue. "It is unnatural for neighboring countries to have contacts on all matters except for political issues."

The official said there has been no response so far from Greece.

Croatia, Albania and Macedonia are all hoping to receive invitations to join the alliance at a NATO summit in April in the Romanian capital, Bucharest.

Macedonia is officially referred to as the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia at the U.N. and other international bodies. But more than 100 countries — including the U.S. Russia and Canada — have recognized it as Macedonia.

Friday, December 21, 2007

From Russia with Veto on Kosovo

By David Edenden: I told you so!

Russia to veto Kosovo independence:
globeandmail.com:

"MOSCOW — Russia will use its clout at the UN to block Western plans to cement Kosovo as an independent state, Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said in a newspaper interview published on Friday.

Kosovo's majority Albanian population is expected to declare unilateral independence from Serbia within weeks, and the European Union, United States and other states are likely to recognize this."

More on Kosovo

The Language Game of Kosovo Diplomacy

12/21/2007 (Balkanalysis.com)

By Nikolas Rajkovic*

Three key words have animated the policy-speak on Kosovo to date: ‘negotiation’, ‘compromise’ and ‘solution.’ These terms seem uncontroversial in their literal sense and have been accepted by the parties and the ‘Troika’ powers (the US, EU and Russia) without dispute. As such, the verbal landscape has been marked by the strategic use of this vocabulary. Yet the professed failure of Kosovo ‘status talks’ now suggests a profound disconnect between stated and actual meaning. The objective here is to critically examine how these terms have been used in diplomatic practice, with a view to revealing the contradictions between rhetoric and action which have fed this latest Balkan crisis.

Recent ‘Troika’ talks were grounded on a commitment to negotiation. Washington, Brussels and Moscow agreed that a lasting and sustainable solution was best attained through negotiated consent. However with the proclaimed failure of negotiations, that commitment is wavering in Washington and some European capitals due to the alleged inability of Belgrade and Pristina to make mutual concessions. However, does this depiction place blame on the wrong doorstep? An affirmative answer points to how Washington scuttled negotiations by announcing its intention to recognize Kosovo ‘independence’ in the event that ‘Troika’ talks failed. This created the bad faith incentive for Pristina to thwart negotiations and run out the clock until December 10. The ‘Troika’ negotiations existed in name only.

This point regarding spoiled negotiations brings us to the next term, compromise, and its similar misuse. The most commonly stated storyline is that Belgrade and Pristina failed to compromise. However, does this account match actual negotiating behaviour as seen? When one examines the conduct of ‘Troika’ negotiations between June and today, a noticeable pattern emerges: Belgrade offered genuine models of far-reaching autonomy (e.g. Hong Kong, the Aland Islands), while Pristina merely reiterated ‘independence.’ Indeed, Pristina did present a post-independence ‘treaty of friendship,’ but was that a bona fide compromise? In fact, at a recent summit in Brussels, outgoing Kosovo first minister Agim Ceku made no secret of his unwillingness to compromise when he hailed Kosovo independence as the “most predictable, unsurprising and unremarkable development in south-eastern Europe for generations.”

Thus we come to the final term – solution – and the current efforts to conflate its meaning with independence. The narrative is as follows: failed negotiations and inadequate compromise make independence the only viable solution for European policy-makers. The first problem with this claim is procedural; it runs afoul of the clean hands rule, which states that the Kosovo Albanians should not be allowed to profit from their own misdemeanour of failing to negotiate and compromise in good faith. A unilateral, one-sided statement of independence is perilous in that it provokes foreseeable and dire consequences. Here independence advocates should be taken to task for their ostrich-like disclaimers that they don’t know what will happen after independence is declared.

First, the historical record is unequivocal: defiant secession in most of the ex-Yugoslav republics has produced a series of bloody inter-ethnic wars. Second, one-sided independence is likely to prompt Kosovo’s Serbian-controlled north to ‘secede’ and rejoin Serbia proper, prompting attacks from the unofficial Albanian National Army and ensuing reactions from Kosovo Serbs. Third, Kosovo secession hands the ultimate Christmas gift to the populist Serbian Radical Party and secessionist forces within neighbouring Bosnia and Macedonia. Finally, the unilateral dismemberment of Serbia would fundamentally change the rules of sovereignty which have maintained precarious stability in the Western Balkans over the past 12 years. Plainly stated, Kosovo independence would herald that ‘all bets are off’ in the Balkans and elsewhere.

In closing, diplomacy on Kosovo has produced feats of rhetoric unmatched in actual practice. The present crisis on Europe’s doorstep is attributable not to failed negotiations but rather disingenuous diplomacy that has failed to make the ethnic parties ultimately responsible for their future. Such a result can only happen when the ‘Troika’ powers unanimously and resolutely declare that a true ‘solution’ only rests in genuine negotiation and real compromise; and anything less is poor fiction. The political end-game which must be sought has no home in the zero-sum theatrics of independence, but rather must be found in the politics of good and responsible government, bearing the flag of prudence and caution.

………………………..

*Nikolas Rajkovic is a political sciences researcher at the European University Institute, Florence, Italy.

Edward Said on Kosovo

David Edenden

I really have not read, in detail, this critique of Edward Said's position on Kosovo. Greater Surbiton and Democratiya are like many commentators who love the Albanians of Kosovo, but not the Macedonians of Greece and who love the Kurds of Iraq, but not the Kurds of Turkey. Go ahead and search their blogs.

I can't speak for Edward but if he were alive today, he would probably say ... its a plot! Just an interesting way of showing how "consent" is manufactured at the expense of the truth.
Edward Said and Kosovo
Greater Surbiton
(also - The Henry Jackson Society)

David Zarnett has written a devastating critique for Democratiya of Edward Said’s disgraceful record over Kosovo, about which I have been meaning to comment since it appeared at the start of this month. Some time ago, David wrote to me asking my opinion as to whether an article on Said and Kosovo would be a worthy endeavour; I remember expressing to him a certain scepticism as to whether Said had written enough about Kosovo to make an in-depth study feasible. I am sorry to say that my scepticism has proven unfounded and that David’s judgement as to the relevance of this topic has been entirely vindicated - Said wrote much more about Kosovo than he should have.

I am sorry, because it means that yet another eminent left-wing intellectual may be added to the list of those prepared to denigrate the peoples of the former Yugoslavia and minimise their suffering, for the sake of the ‘higher cause’ of scoring cheap points against the US. Said was not, as I had imagined, someone who had simply added his voice casually to the ‘anti-imperialist’ chorus at the time of the Kosovo War in 1999, but a dyed-in-the-wool anti-American zealot to whom the question of whether the Kosovo Albanians would be able to live in their own country, or whether they would become the Palestinians of Europe, mattered absolutely nothing. Indeed, he was much happier with the idea of the Kosovo Albanians losing their homeland and becoming a diaspora than he was with the idea of the US intervening militarily.

The reason this is particularly shocking in Said’s case is, of course, because he was himself a Palestinian; indeed, the most eminent intellectual champion of the Palestinian cause in the Western world. Said perceived a parallel between the fate of the Kosovo Albanians in 1999 and the fate of the Palestinians in 1948; in an article published during the Kosovo War, he wrote of the ’persecution, ethnic cleansing and continued oppression of Albanians in the province of Kosovo by the Serbian forces of Slobodan Milosevic’, before adding that ’for Palestinians, 1948 was like this minus CNN: at that time 780,000 were evicted from their houses and property by Zionist forces. They remain a nation in exile fifty-one years later.’ But his perception of this parallel did not lead him to express the slightest solidarity with the Kosovo Albanians - on the contrary…

I do not wish to plunder Zarnett’s splendid article for quotes showing just how far Said was prepared to go in minimising both the suffering of the Albanians and the crimes of the Milosevic regime; I’d recommend instead reading the article directly. Suffice to say that Said used the term ‘Sunday school picnic’ in reference to the fate of Milosevic’s Albanian victims. A fate that was, in his opinion, similar to that which befell the Palestinians in 1948, only with added CNN coverage.


Wednesday, December 19, 2007

Turkey Plays with Macedonia, Greece Cries, Takes Its Marbles and Goes Home!

"Greece slams Turkey's support to Macedonia's name"
Makfax vesnik:

Athens /19/12/ 12:47

Greece slammed Turkey's support to Macedonia's NATO entry by its constitutional name, Greek media said on Wednesday.

'Turkey, same as other NATO member states, was duly notified about the conditions in which Greece will use its veto powers. Turkey is well aware that members of NATO as well as of the European Union are entitled to certain rights, including the possibility to exercise such rights,' Greek Foreign Minister Dora Bakoyannis said.

Bakoyannis' statement comes one day after the Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan spelled out Turkey's full support to Macedonia's NATO membership, noting that Turkey would do its outmost to ensure that Macedonia gets NATO membership invitation next year.

During the talks with Macedonian Prime Minister Nikola Gruevski, who visited Ankara on Tuesday, Turkish PM Erdogan said Greece has no right to urge an independent and a sovereign country to change its name. /end/"

Solana blah blah blah!

David Edenden: Can someone please waterboard Solana?
Solana vows EU will not ignore responsibilities regarding Kosovo
SETimes.com

"Solana vows EU will not ignore responsibilities regarding Kosovo

19/12/2007

LJUBLJANA, Slovenia -- The EU will help find a solution to the Kosovo status issue and will not ignore its responsibilities to the public there, despite the failure of negotiations mediated by the international troika, security chief Javier Solana said on Tuesday (December 18th) in Ljubljana. After meeting with Slovenian Foreign Minister Dimitrij Rupel, Solana told reporters there is no major division within the EU over Kosovo, and stressed that a unified EU position would be crucial to a lasting solution. The UN Security Council begins debating Kosovo's future on Wednesday.

Separately, the EU envoy in the mediating troika, Wolfgang Ischinger, said he is certain that the status process will end peacefully. Speaking in Berlin late on Monday, Ischinger downplayed the threat of Serbia using military force, should Kosovo declare independence. (Telegrafi, Balkanweb, RTK, RTRS, Beta, B92, Reuters - 18/12/07)"

Macedonia urges Greece not to block its NATO bid (SETimes.com)

Macedonia urges Greece not to block its NATO bid
SETimes.com

"Macedonia urges Greece not to block its NATO bid

19/12/2007

SKOPJE, Macedonia -- Foreign Minister Antonio Milososki told reporters on Tuesday (December 18th) that Macedonia has asked Greece not to block its NATO accession bid and has suggested high-level talks regarding the long-standing name dispute. He added that Greece's right to veto the accession was akin to having a nuclear bomb. Athens considers the official name of Macedonia to be an attempt to steal Greece's cultural heritage and a territorial claim of the Greek province with the same name. UN-sponsored talks on the issue resume next month in Skopje.

Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan sided with Skopje in the name dispute Tuesday. After meeting with Macedonian counterpart, Nikola Gruevski, he said it is 'wrong' to ask a country to change its official name. (Turkish Daily News, Utrinski Vesnik, Vecer, Zaman, Xinhua - 19/12/07; AP, Xinhua, Makfax, A1, MIA, - 18/12/07)"

Tuesday, December 18, 2007

Serbs use words of Western leaders to support Kosovo stand - International Herald Tribune

David Edenden

The US and EU are such powerful economic, military and political magnets that ordinary Serbs see their future with the EU rather than Russia, even though the EU is pushing full steam ahead on the partition of Serbia. This is the key to EU success in their Balkan policy and the also the key to their failure in the Russian policy.

Russia will go along with the "West" in the Balkans for a free hand in their sphere of influence. It's the big fish eating the little fish all over again.
Serbs use words of Western leaders to support Kosovo stand
International Herald Tribune:

"For all their ties with Russia - including a shared Christian Orthodox faith and military alliances dating back two centuries - Serbs today appear to have far more in common with the West. Serbia borders the European Union to the north and east and does not border Russia, Bokan noted. And Serbs, he said, play in the National Basketball Association in the United States and in soccer clubs throughout Europe.

'Ask anybody the name of a Russian film director, composer or even rock group and they will struggle, but they can name five or six American directors,' Bokan said.

The poster campaign, he said, is a reminder that Serbs can still fight for their cause and be Europeans.

Ljiljana Smajlovic, editor of Politika, a conservative broadsheet that has run a vigorous campaign against Kosovo's independence, is more specific.

'I don't expect the government to go to war' over Kosovo, she said in a telephone interview. 'But I expect them to go to court over this. I think one can be a good European and still protest this.'"

Bulgarians About Travel in Tetovo, Macedonia

Tito, Teto and Some Troubled Tourism Await You in Tetovo
Balkan Travellers



Text by Dimana Trankova | Photographs by Anthony Georgieff

Legend says that Tetovo was named after the mythical Teto, who cleared snakes from what was a village at the foot of the Šar Mountain many centuries ago. But perhaps this fable alone won't persuade you to leave the Skopje to Ohrid highway and visit this city in northwest Macedonia close to the border with Kosovo. Indeed, Tetovo has hardly been a magnet for travellers. For a long time the only tourists near here were those en route to Macedonia's most famous ski resort, Popova Šapka.

Unfortunately, to most outsiders, Tetovo is not renowned for its skiing facilities. Rather, it has a more forbidding reputation. It is the scene of the Albanian separatist National Liberation Army's (NLA) fierce clashes with Macedonian security forces in the 2001 conflict.

But the Albanian minority's unofficial capital, at one time part of the Ottoman Empire, as well as belonging to Serbia, Great Albania and Yugoslavia – and also the refuge for a considerable number of tsarist officers after the Russian Revolution – offers a pleasant and friendly surprise.

Tetovo's central square is not exactly enticing. It has the usual combination of broken pavements and dilapidated monuments, relics of the Communist era under Marshal Tito, the former Yugoslavian leader who tried to steer his own path between East and West.



Tito's buildings are of an architectural style designed to prove the superiority of his brand of Communism over Todor Zhivkov's. Just don't expect any earth-shattering contrast to Bulgaria!

But don't give up on Tetovo just yet. Turn left into Ilindenska Street and reach the humpback stone bridge over the Pena River. There you will see, rising on the other side of the river, a building that can rightfully claim to be the world's most colourful mosque. And the interior is just as striking as its façade.



The walls of the Aladzha Mosque, also known as Šarena Dzamija, or the “Painted” Mosque, are covered with geometrical shapes in green, blue, ochre and red – a truly delightful sight. And, thankfully, the building forms just part of a brighter enclave in an otherwise drab location.

Surrounding the mosque is a small park with well-maintained rosebushes and towering trees that provide a welcome contrast to the neglected central square. The Pena River babbles at its side and an abandoned Turkish bath cuts across it, part of an old complex of inns around the mosque.



Until fairly recently it housed a restaurant that went by the rather pretentious name of “Sheraton”. The octagonal turbe, or tomb, with the remains of Hurshida and Mensure, the women who founded the complex (the first building was finished in 1459), is right in front of the mosque.

“Do you like it? They used 30,000 eggs to make the paint.” A friendly young schoolgirl from the building's top-floor religious school approached us inside the mosque to practise her English. But most children are shy and only speak Albanian, the second official tongue in the Macedonian Republic since 2002.

The addition of the second language stemmed from provisions in the peace treaty that ended the conflict. Under its terms any language spoken by more than 20 percent of the population became, like Macedonian, an official state language. The Albanians, numbering just over 25 percent, are the only group eligible. But tolerance of another tongue has failed to dissolve simmering tensions. Since the republic split from Yugoslavia after a 1991 referendum, relations between Tetovo's two largest ethnic groups have been precariously poised between peace and war.

The South East European University was part of the problem. Established illegally in several houses in the nearby village of Mala Rechica, it became the country's first institution to teach students in Albanian. Legalised in 2001, it now has its own web page and is a rival to Tetovo State University.



But the Bektashi monks in the nearby Harabati Baba Tekke, a Dervish lodge, have a long history of hardship. Situated outside the city, by the large new cemetery at the foot of Popova Šapka, the monastery has a conspicuous three-storey, ultramarine-painted tower. The monks claim the tower was the last home of a high-ranking Albanian named Roxalana, who died of tuberculosis there. According to a more popular theory, it was part of the monastery's defence system, founded in the 16th Century.

The tower could not protect the tekke either from being burnt by guerrillas in 1948 or from Yugoslavia's Communists, who banned its religious activities and converted it from a haven of meditation into a tourist complex comprising a hotel, restaurant and disco. In those years – ironically, the Macedonian Communist Party was founded in 1943 in Tetovo – the monastery was silent proof of the legend explaining its unofficial name, Sersem Tekke, or the Fool's Tekke.

The story, recounted by present-day Bektashi monks with suitable self-irony, relates to a dream of Ali Baba, one of Suleiman the Magnificent's most esteemed high officials. The vision of this highly respected Bektashi leader in the Ottoman Empire was so inspiring that Ali Baba decided to abandon secular life and devote himself to religious contemplation. Angered but powerless, Suleiman told his vizier: “If you will be a sersem (fool), then go.” Ali Baba settled in Tetovo, which was practically unknown at the time, and became popular as Sersem Baba. Officially, the monastery is named after Harabati Baba, the only disciple of the former vizier, who took over the institution after Ali Baba's death in 1569.



While strolling in the large monastery garden or looking at the old stones in its cemetery, you may decide that Ali Baba was a sensible man rather than a sersem. The complex, whose main buildings were constructed in the 18th Century, became the focal point for the Bektashi living in this part of the Balkan Peninsula and survived even though Atatürk banned the order in its native Turkey in 1922. According to some estimates, nearly a quarter of Muslims here belonged to this denomination at the beginning of the 20th Century.

Despite Communist persecution, the tekke quickly restored its initial activities in 1995 following an initiative by Baba Tahir Emini. Today, there are 10 to 15 Bektashi monks living there. “We just want peace and privacy. So we don't advertise ourselves and we try not to attract tourists,” one of them tells us. But sit with them under the shed – decorated with portraits of Imam Ali, the reverse clocks and pictures from Baba Tahir Emini's funeral some months ago – and the monks can be very hospitable.

Gradually, more tourists are coming. Ironically, they're attracted not by the fêted Popova Šapka, or Priest's Hat, named after an Orthodox monk's headgear, but by the religious order and its monuments that were forbidden until just a few years ago.

This article is courtesy of the Bulgarian magazine Vagabond.

Saturday, December 15, 2007

US State Department Daily Press Briefing -- December 14, 2007

By David Edenden

It's nice to see that the US State Department is standing firm on the "Name Issue". My over wrought post regarding a Greek newspaper rumor of the betrayal of Macedonia's name in exchange for Greek support for Kosovo independence was wrong and I apologize to President Bush, Condi Rice, Paul Pfeuffer, Ambassador Gillian Arlette Milovanovic, and finally Sean McCormack (someone send this guy some Macedonian feta cheese) ... but not Barack Obama!

Our friend Mr. Lambros, said something about Bulgaria which is garbled. It seems Bulgaria is also standing firm on Macedonia's name and is opposed to any back room deal between the US and Greece to "stab Macedonia in the back". It's good to have Bulgaria so firmly on our side on this issue. In the Christmas spirit, I want to thank all Bulgarians everywhere!

Daily Press Briefing -- December 14:

(MR. MCCORMACK:) "Lambros. Let it out.

QUESTION: On FYROM, Mr. McCormack.

MR. MCCORMACK: Yes, indeed.

QUESTION: Any readout on the today's talks among Deputy Secretary John Negroponte, DAS Daniel Fried and a senior official from FYROM?

MR. MCCORMACK: This is a -- is this a -- the Foreign Minister from Macedonia you're speaking about?

QUESTION: I guess that's the official, yes.

MR. MCCORMACK: Understood. They were --

QUESTION: Of FYROM, you said Macedonia.

MR. MCCORMACK: We've made our decision. You're still working on yours. They're probably going to talk about NATO, talk about the importance of continuing reforms that Macedonia has underway, probably talk a little bit about Kosovo, the fact that Macedonia can play an important role, along with other states in the region, maintaining, you know, a stable atmosphere. And they'll probably also talk about the name issue in this. We have made our decision, but there are still other outstanding questions specifically with respect to NATO. There's a process underway.

QUESTION: To which extent did you discuss the name issue? Any concrete details, if you can say so?

MR. MCCORMACK: I don't have any more details for you.

QUESTION: And the last one. I was told by a high reliable source before yesterday that the U.S. Government is not sure if it's going to implement any agreement between Athens and Skopje on the name issue in order to avoid Albania and Bulgaria, which is crucial. Mr. McCormack, some FYROM officials or Bulgarian (inaudible) not to change the name. I'm wondering how Bulgaria is involved in this case (inaudible)?

MR. MCCORMACK: I don't know. I don’t know.

QUESTION: The Department of State (inaudible.)

MR. MCCORMACK: I couldn't begin to tell you. I don't know about this. We as a government have made our decision about the name issue. It's Macedonia. There's still an open question within NATO right now. It's under consideration. We have -- you know, the Secretary when she's met with the Greek Foreign Minister as well as others, that urge that this process be resolved as part of the questions about Macedonia's potential membership.

QUESTION: Are you going to implement any agreement between the two sides?

MR. MCCORMACK: Between what two sides?

QUESTION: FYROM and Greece on the names?

MR. MCCORMACK: They have to work something out first. Look, Lambros, we've made our decision. I'm not sure I see the -- fire on all the connections here.

QUESTION: I -- has the meeting actually happened yet?

MR. MCCORMACK: I don't know exactly. I'm not sure. It could have. Yeah, or it could not have either. But --